ferezero.blogg.se

1. Sin city a dame to kill for movie#
2. Sin city a dame to kill for full#
3. Sin city a dame to kill for series#

But here, the desire to make Sin City bigger and badder stretches the film too thin. Fans know well that Sin City could never be accused of being a thinking man’s comic book movie, but underneath all the stylistic flourishes and cigarette smoke, there was just enough there to make you care about the characters.

That first story exposes one major problem with the movie, if not its deepest one: for all its style, there is precious little depth. "Welcome back," Miller tells us, right before hitting us with his car. In the end, the story serves chiefly to create atmosphere by throwing us straight into the madness. But beyond seeing bad guys get what’s coming to them, there’s nothing investing us in the action save for seeing the hyper-stylized blood and bullets fly. "Just Another Saturday Night," the very first tale, involves Marv killing murderous frat boys just for the sake of fun and brutal justice. He was such a standout, over-the-top character in the original film that his presence alone drags us right back into his seedy world.

Sin city a dame to kill for movie#

It’s telling that the movie positions him as a central figure. There’s just more of everything: more guns, more blood, more dark alleys to get lost in, and more characters to wax poetic about life in a hopeless city.Īnd certainly more of Marv - played gleefully by Mickey Rourke - ripping through his enemies like an angry battering ram. Miller told me at Comic-Con that the new film gave him "the chance to explore world more deeply." That intent shines throughout told in four intersecting stories, the film feels bigger, darker, and more expansive in scope, exposing us to more characters (both new and returning) and more places than we’ve previously seen. Is Sin City worth the visit? The answer, frankly, is no.Ī Dame to Kill For serves as both a prequel and sequel to Sin City, with stories taking place before and after those told in the original. So, with a decade’s worth of perspective, a movie like this asks us if we’re willing to go back.

It also promises a return to form for a master thought by many to be well past his prime. Sin City: A Dame to Kill For, once again co-directed by Miller and Rodriguez, is the long-awaited follow-up to the original film, promising a return to that world of booze, broads, and bullets that so captivated audiences all those years ago. While lauded for his early work on Batman and Daredevil, his later years have been marred by work that’s been rightly called racist, misogynist, and even occasionally fascist. Meanwhile, Miller’s industry clout has been in an ongoing state of decline. Despite announcing plans to release a follow-up soon after the film’s release, the Sin City 2 project was quickly delayed and fell into a long development hell. It’s taken nine years to make the trip back, and the road has been hard.

Sin city a dame to kill for full#

It may have lacked for substance, sure, but the movie - full of brutal anti-heroes and sexy femme fatales straight out of Mickey Spillane - dripped with a singularly bloodsoaked style that was hard to ignore.

Sin city a dame to kill for series#

It was visually groundbreaking Rodriguez took Miller’s original graphic novel series and faithfully brought it to life on screen, using only black, white, and splashes of bright color as his palette. Frank Miller, a legend in the comics world, had teamed up with Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino to produce a neo-noir fantasy world tailor-made for the 21st century. When Sin City debuted in 2005, it hit like a sledgehammer.